Ex Parte Trice

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex Parte Trice

298 S.W. 589, 107 Tex. Crim. 638, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 542

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 12, 1927

DocketNo. 11217.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 298 S.W. 589 (Ex Parte Trice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Trice, 298 S.W. 589, 107 Tex. Crim. 638, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 542 (Tex. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge. —

Appellant is under indictment in the District Court of Stephens County, wherein he is charged with theft of property over the value of fifty dollars. The court required of appellant a bond in the sum of one thousand dollars, and on application for a writ of habeas corpus, wherein it was alleged that the amount of the bail was excessive and that appellant was unable to furnish bond in the amount of one thousand dollars, evidence was heard and the application for a reduction of the amount of bail was overruled. This is an appeal from the order of the court.

The record shows that appellant has no property and that he has been unable, after effort made, to furnish the bond required of him. While appellant’s ability or lack thereof to make bond cannot alone control, it may be regarded in determining the amount of bail, and proof heard thereon. Article 281, C. C. P.; Ex Parte Jones, 296 S. W. 886. In overruling appellant’s application the court states in his order that the bond required of appellant was in the usual and customary amount fixed by the court in ordinary felony cases. No arbitrary rule for fixing bail can be reconciled with the provisions of Article 281, C. C. P., which provides that bail shall be sufficiently high to give reasonable assurance that the undertaking will be complied with; that the power to require bail is not to be so used as to make it an instrument of oppression; that the nature of the offense and the circumstances under which it was committed are to be considered ; and that the ability to make bail is to be regarded, and that proof may be taken on this point. Applying these rules to the instant case, we are of the opinion that, under the record, the amount of bail should be reduced to five hundred dollars. See Ex Parte Castillo, 277 S. W. 126.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and bail fixed in the sum of five hundred dollars.

Bail reduced to $500.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTIAN, Judge. —

Appellant is under indictment in the District Court of Stephens County, wherein he is charged with theft of property over the value of fifty dollars. The court required of appellant a bond in the sum of one thousand dollars, and on application for a writ of habeas corpus, wherein it was alleged that the amount of the bail was excessive and that appellant was unable to furnish bond in the amount of one thousand dollars, evidence was heard and the application for a reduction of the amount of bail was overruled. This is an appeal from the order of the court.

The record shows that appellant has no property and that he has been unable, after effort made, to furnish the bond required of him. While appellant’s ability or lack thereof to make bond cannot alone control, it may be regarded in determining the amount of bail, and proof heard thereon. Article 281, C. C. P.; Ex Parte Jones, 296 S. W. 886. In overruling appellant’s application the court states in his order that the bond required of appellant was in the usual and customary amount fixed by the court in ordinary felony cases. No arbitrary rule for fixing bail can be reconciled with the provisions of Article 281, C. C. P., which provides that bail shall be sufficiently high to give reasonable assurance that the undertaking will be complied with; that the power to require bail is not to be so used as to make it an instrument of oppression; that the nature of the offense and the circumstances under which it was committed are to be considered ; and that the ability to make bail is to be regarded, and that proof may be taken on this point. Applying these rules to the instant case, we are of the opinion that, under the record, the amount of bail should be reduced to five hundred dollars. See Ex Parte Castillo, 277 S. W. 126.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and bail fixed in the sum of five hundred dollars.

Bail reduced to $500.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 S.W. 589, 107 Tex. Crim. 638, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-trice-texcrimapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack