Ex parte Tochman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Ex parte Tochman

23 F. Cas. 1349, 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 268, 1847 U.S. App. LEXIS 598

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedMay 22, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 23 F. Cas. 1349 (Ex parte Tochman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Tochman, 23 F. Cas. 1349, 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 268, 1847 U.S. App. LEXIS 598 (circtddc 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

On the 19th of May. 1847, after THE COURT had given its opinion in regard to the information given by Mr. Bradley to the court containing certain charges against Mr. [Gaspard] Tochman, but not asking for any specific remedy or proceeding against him, Mr. Tochman moved for leave to withdraw tl>e papers which he had filed with and referred to in his answer to those charges, THE COURT having decided that the case did not in his opinion call for the exercise of its summary jurisdiction. As the information did not ask for any specific remedy, but left the subject entirely to the discretion of the court, it seems to be a question between Mr. Tochman and the court only whether the court shall permit the papers filed by him [1350]*1350to be withdrawn without leaving' attested copies. There being no parties litigant before tiie court, the general rule, that the original papers filed in a suit shall not be withdrawn without leaving attested copies, does not seem to be applicable to the present case. There is no person who can claim any right to have the papers retained, and we can see no use in retaining them. If, however, any person desires to have copies of any of them before they are withdrawn, the court will permit such copies to be taken at the cost of the persons requiring the same, and for that purpose the papers will remain as they are until the 29th day of this month, on or after which day the papers filed by Hr. Tochman with his answer as aforesaid may be withdrawn by him.

By order of THE COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the 19th of May. 1847, after THE COURT had given its opinion in regard to the information given by Mr. Bradley to the court containing certain charges against Mr. [Gaspard] Tochman, but not asking for any specific remedy or proceeding against him, Mr. Tochman moved for leave to withdraw tl>e papers which he had filed with and referred to in his answer to those charges, THE COURT having decided that the case did not in his opinion call for the exercise of its summary jurisdiction. As the information did not ask for any specific remedy, but left the subject entirely to the discretion of the court, it seems to be a question between Mr. Tochman and the court only whether the court shall permit the papers filed by him [1350]*1350to be withdrawn without leaving' attested copies. There being no parties litigant before tiie court, the general rule, that the original papers filed in a suit shall not be withdrawn without leaving attested copies, does not seem to be applicable to the present case. There is no person who can claim any right to have the papers retained, and we can see no use in retaining them. If, however, any person desires to have copies of any of them before they are withdrawn, the court will permit such copies to be taken at the cost of the persons requiring the same, and for that purpose the papers will remain as they are until the 29th day of this month, on or after which day the papers filed by Hr. Tochman with his answer as aforesaid may be withdrawn by him.

By order of THE COURT.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F. Cas. 1349, 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 268, 1847 U.S. App. LEXIS 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-tochman-circtddc-1847.