Ex Parte Timothy Patrick Lee

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 28, 2019
Docket11-18-00344-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Timothy Patrick Lee (Ex Parte Timothy Patrick Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Timothy Patrick Lee, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Order filed February 28, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-18-00344-CR ___________

TIMOTHY PATRICK LEE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 106th District Court Gaines County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17-4721

ORDER Timothy Patrick Lee, who is currently represented by court-appointed counsel David G. Rogers, has filed in this court a timely request to proceed pro se on appeal. Lee asks to be substituted for Rogers so that Lee may proceed with this appeal pro se. We abate this appeal. We must abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court so that the trial court may determine the following: 1. Whether Lee desires to prosecute his appeal; 2. Whether Lee remains indigent; 3. If not indigent, whether Lee has retained counsel for this appeal; and 4. If indigent, whether Lee desires to have counsel appointed to represent him in this appeal or whether, after being warned of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, Lee competently and intelligently chooses to exercise the right to represent himself.

If it is determined that Lee is indigent and is exercising his right to represent himself, the trial court must develop evidence as to whether Lee’s decision to proceed without counsel is knowingly and intelligently made. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975); Ex parte Davis, 818 S.W.2d 64 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); Webb v. State, 533 S.W.2d 780, 783–86 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976). We note that Lee need not appear in person at the hearing and that the trial court may permit him to appear via telephone. The trial court is directed to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law and to make any appropriate recommendations to this court. The clerk of the trial court is directed to prepare and forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings, recommendations, and any orders of the trial court. The court reporter is directed to prepare and forward to this court the reporter’s record from the hearing. These records are due to be filed in this court on or before March 29, 2019. The appeal is abated.

February 28, 2019 PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Ex Parte Davis
818 S.W.2d 64 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Webb v. State
533 S.W.2d 780 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Hubbard v. State
739 S.W.2d 341 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Timothy Patrick Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-timothy-patrick-lee-texapp-2019.