Ex Parte Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Thompson

196 So. 898, 240 Ala. 708

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 6, 1940·No. 6 Div. 600.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court is of the opinion, after a careful consideration of the record and the evidence submitted on petitioner’s application to be reinstated as an attorney at law, authorizing him to again practice law in the state of Alabama, that the finding and judgment of the Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar, denying petitioner’s said application, should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court is of the opinion, after a careful consideration of the record and the evidence submitted on petitioner’s application to be reinstated as an attorney at law, authorizing him to again practice law in the state of Alabama, that the finding and judgment of the Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar, denying petitioner’s said application, should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Ex Parte Thompson, 196 So. 898, 240 Ala. 708 (Ala. 1940).

Pincite

196 So. 898 (Ex Parte Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.