Ex Parte Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Thompson

196 So. 898, 240 Ala. 708

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 6, 1940

Docket6 Div. 600.

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 898 (Ex Parte Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Thompson, 196 So. 898, 240 Ala. 708 (Ala. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court is of the opinion, after a careful consideration of the record and the evidence submitted on petitioner’s application to be reinstated as an attorney at law, authorizing him to again practice law in the state of Alabama, that the finding and judgment of the Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar, denying petitioner’s said application, should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court is of the opinion, after a careful consideration of the record and the evidence submitted on petitioner’s application to be reinstated as an attorney at law, authorizing him to again practice law in the state of Alabama, that the finding and judgment of the Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar, denying petitioner’s said application, should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 So. 898, 240 Ala. 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-thompson-ala-1940.