Ex parte Thomas

538 S.W.2d 622
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided July 14, 1976·No. No. 51828·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding under Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P.

Petitioner challenges his conviction for the offense of murder where he was assessed punishment at twenty years because he had been convicted for robbery by firearms growing out of the same transaction where he was assessed twenty years. The sentences ran concurrently. He contends that he should not have been convicted for the second offense because his first conviction constituted jeopardy.

The hearing court found that the victim in both offenses was Thomas E. Terry and no circumstances that interrupted the continuous nature of the assault. The court concluded that the robbery conviction, Cause No. C73-12605-IM, is valid and the conviction for murder in Cause No. C73-12604-IM is void.

Upon the hearing court’s finding, we conclude that the murder conviction must be set aside. See Ex parte Hilliard, 538 S.W.2d 135 (Tex.Cr.App., decided July 7, 1976); and Ex parte Jewel, 535 S.W.2d 362 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). Cf. Ex parte Caldwell, 537 S.W.2d 265 (Tex.Cr.App.1976).

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Thomas, 538 S.W.2d 622 (Tex. 1976).

538 S.W.2d 622 (Ex parte Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rubino v. Lynaugh
770 S.W.2d 802 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Ex parte Olson
560 S.W.2d 688 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)