Ex parte Thomas
This text of 404 S.W.2d 596 (Ex parte Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[597]*597OPINION
Petitioner has filed his original application for writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was tried without benefit of counsel before a jury on his plea of not guilty to the charge of theft of a cow, two prior convictions being alleged for the purpose of enhancement. Conviction was had in 1940 with a life sentence being imposed.
Petitioner alleges as a ground for not having applied for a writ before this application the following: “Petitioner was without funds to retain legal advice needed.”
We are not constrained to construe this as an allegation of indigency at the time of his trial in 1940.
The writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
404 S.W.2d 596, 1966 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-thomas-texcrimapp-1966.