Ex Parte Thomas

136 S.W. 60, 61 Tex. Crim. 573, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 153
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 15, 1911·No. No. 1143.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

—The relator was fined in the Corporation Court of the city of Dallas for contempt. He applied to the criminal district judge of Dallas County for a writ of habeas corpus. Hpon the hearing of this writ the same was dismissed and from this order of dismissal relator gave notice of appeal to this court. An appeal does not lie from an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus and this court has no jurisdiction to determine this appeal. See Ex parte Strong, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 309, 30 S. W. Rep., 666; Ex parte Blankenship, 57 S. W. Rep., 646; Ex parte Hodges, 45 S. W. Rep., 913; Ex parte Teague, 45 S. W. Rep., 129.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Thomas, 136 S.W. 60, 61 Tex. Crim. 573, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 153 (Tex. 1911).

136 S.W. 60 (Ex Parte Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Renier
734 S.W.2d 349 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Ex Parte Noble
176 S.W.2d 951 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Ex Parte Muse
168 S.W. 520 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)