Ex parte Thomas

37 P. 514, 103 Cal. 497, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 807
California Supreme Court·Decided August 4, 1894·No. No. 21157·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The Court.

The return to the writ of habeas corpus issued herein shows that the petitioner was convicted in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco of the crime of adultery, and thereupon sentenced to be imprisoned in the county jail for one year, and that he is now held in custody under commitment based upon said judgment.

The judgment is void. Adultery is not made a crime by any statute of California. It is the living together in open and notorious cohabitation and adultery that is made criminal by the statute (Stats. 1871-72, p. 380), and it has been rightly held that mere adultery without the notorious cohabitation does not constitute the offense. (People v. Gates, 46 Cal. 52.)

The judgment being void the imprisonment is necessarily unlawful, and the prisoner must be discharged. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Thomas, 37 P. 514, 103 Cal. 497, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 807 (Cal. 1894).

37 P. 514 (Ex parte Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bass
225 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1963)
In Re Lane
372 P.2d 897 (California Supreme Court, 1962)
In Re Tom Wong
10 P.2d 797 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
People v. Birrier
18 P.R. 260 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1912)
Pueblo v. Birrier
18 P.R. Dec. 265 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1912)