Ex parte the Candelaria Fruit Co.

6 P.R. 537

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided May 12, 1904·No. No. 126·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice QuiñoNes,

after stating the foregoing facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the judgment appealed from are accepted.

Having examined the legal provisions therein cited, we ad[543]*543judge that we ought to affirm and do affirm said judgment, with costs against the appellant.

[546]*546Jueces concurrentes: Sres. Hernández, Figueras, Sulz-bacher y MacLeary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice QuiñoNes,

after stating the foregoing facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the judgment appealed from are accepted.

Having examined the legal provisions therein cited, we ad[543]*543judge that we ought to affirm and do affirm said judgment, with costs against the appellant.

[546]*546Jueces concurrentes: Sres. Hernández, Figueras, Sulz-bacher y MacLeary.

Ex parte the Candelaria Fruit Co., 6 P.R. 537 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

6 P.R. 537 (Ex parte the Candelaria Fruit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.