Ex parte Terry

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Ex parte Terry

14 S.C. Eq. 1

DecidedDecember 15, 1838

StatusPublished

This text of 14 S.C. Eq. 1 (Ex parte Terry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Terry, 14 S.C. Eq. 1 (S.C. Ct. App. 1838).

Pincite

Opinion

Ctjria, per Harper, Ch.

I may observe, that this petition is not properly before us, as the rule of the court is, that the error should be certified by two counsel. — 1 Harr. Ch. 647. In this instance it has been done by one only. A deposite too is generally directed on account of costs. I have looked carefully, however, into the alleged grounds of error and am satisfied that they are entirely unfounded.

The petition is dismissed.

Johnson and Dunkin, Chancellors, concurred. Johnston, Ch. having been of counsel, gave no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ctjria, per Harper, Ch.

I may observe, that this petition is not properly before us, as the rule of the court is, that the error should be certified by two counsel. — 1 Harr. Ch. 647. In this instance it has been done by one only. A deposite too is generally directed on account of costs. I have looked carefully, however, into the alleged grounds of error and am satisfied that they are entirely unfounded.

The petition is dismissed.

Johnson and Dunkin, Chancellors, concurred. Johnston, Ch. having been of counsel, gave no opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 S.C. Eq. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-terry-scctapp-1838.