Ex Parte Terry Anderson
Opinion
On January 2, 2007, the trial court denied Terry Anderson's application for writ of habeas corpus without conducting an evidentiary hearing or issuing the writ of habeas corpus. We questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal. We received no response.
No appeal lies from the refusal to issue a writ of habeas corpus unless the trial court rules on the merits of the application. Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Ex parte Noe, 646 S.W.2d 230 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983). In this case, the trial court did not address the merits of Anderson's petition. The trial court did not issue a writ of habeas corpus, nor did the court conduct an evidentiary hearing on the application for the writ. Compare Ex parte Silva, 968 S.W.2d 367 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Ex parte McCullough, 966 S.W.2d 529 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). We hold we have no jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
_______________________________
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
Opinion Delivered March 7, 2007
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Terry Anderson (Ex Parte Terry Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.