Ex parte Teplitz

261 S.W.2d 567, 159 Tex. Crim. 94, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1791
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 21, 1953·No. No. 26,555·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Does the respondent in an extradition case make out a prima facie case authorizing extradition by the introduction in evidence of the executive warrant of the Governor of this state, which is in all things regular upon its face?

This is the sole question presented by this record.

The requisition of the Governor of the demanding state for relator’s extradition was not offered in evidence.

Ex parte Norris, 154 Tex. Cr. R. 68, 225 S. W. 2d 193, is a direct authority requiring that the question be answered in the affirmative. See, also, Ex parte Berry, 139 Tex. Cr. R. 67, 138 S. W. 2d 813; Ex parte McMillan, 156 Tex. Cr. Rep. 355, 242 S. W. 2d 384.

The judgment remanding relator to the custody of the transfer agent in extradition is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Teplitz, 261 S.W.2d 567, 159 Tex. Crim. 94, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1791 (Tex. 1953).

261 S.W.2d 567 (Ex parte Teplitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Hoover
298 S.W.2d 579 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Ex Parte Hagler
278 S.W.2d 143 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Ex parte Parkinson
160 Tex. Crim. 369 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)