Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Ex parte Teal

Ex parte Teal

153 So. 2d 656, 42 Ala. App. 97, 1963 Ala. App. LEXIS 253
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 14, 1963
Docket7 Div. 735
StatusPublished

This text of 153 So. 2d 656 (Ex parte Teal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Teal, 153 So. 2d 656, 42 Ala. App. 97, 1963 Ala. App. LEXIS 253 (Ala. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Teal, in Kilby Prison, asks us to compel the City of Anniston to withdraw, dismiss or proceed with a “detainer” lodged against him at Kilby by the City.

The allegations are not directed against any officer of the City. If the charge against Teal is for a felony, then he has no call upon the City. The State has sole prosecution of felonies after indictment. Constitution 1901, § 170, and Amendment 37; Code 1940, T. 15, §§ 169 and 170.

We see no application of the doctrine of Ex parte State, ex rel. Attorney General, [98]*98255 Ala. 443, 52 So.2d 158. Cf. Accardo v. State, 39 Ala.App. 453, 102 So.2d 913; Billingsley v. State, 34 Ala.App. 475, 41 So.2d 431; and Howell v. City of Ft. Payne, 246 Ala. 315, 20 So.2d 880.

The petition for mandamus is

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Accardo v. State
102 So. 2d 913 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)
Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Attorney General
52 So. 2d 158 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Howell v. City of Fort Payne
20 So. 2d 880 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)
Billingsley v. State
41 So. 2d 431 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 So. 2d 656, 42 Ala. App. 97, 1963 Ala. App. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-teal-alactapp-1963.