Ex Parte Swinea v. State

100 So. 87, 211 Ala. 213, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 465
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 1, 1924·No. 8 Div. 663.·Published

Opinion

GARDNER, X

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of G. W. Swinea v. State, 100 South. 86. 1 The petition does not disclose that an application for rehearing had been made to said Court of Appeals and such application denied. This is required as a condition precedent to a consideration of the petition here under the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 42, as amended and as set out in 198 Ala. xiv.

The petition is dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. X, and SAYRE and MID-LER, JX, concur.
1

19 Ala. App. 618.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Swinea v. State, 100 So. 87, 211 Ala. 213, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 465 (Ala. 1924).

100 So. 87 (Ex Parte Swinea v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swinea v. State
100 So. 86 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)