Ex Parte Sudderth

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ex Parte Sudderth

132 S.W.2d 412, 137 Tex. Crim. 506, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 496

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 25, 1939·No. No. 20773.·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The' question presented by this record is identical with that presented by the case of Ex Parte Gussie Ferguson, No. 20,714, this day decided by us. (Page 494 of this volume). For the reasons assigned in that opinion, the relator is ordered discharged.

The foregoing opinion of the ' Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The' question presented by this record is identical with that presented by the case of Ex Parte Gussie Ferguson, No. 20,714, this day decided by us. (Page 494 of this volume). For the reasons assigned in that opinion, the relator is ordered discharged.

The foregoing opinion of the ' Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Ex Parte Sudderth, 132 S.W.2d 412, 137 Tex. Crim. 506, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 496 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

132 S.W.2d 412 (Ex Parte Sudderth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.