Ex Parte Subel

541 So. 2d 15, 1989 WL 36132
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 3, 1989
Docket87-1431
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 541 So. 2d 15 (Ex Parte Subel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Subel, 541 So. 2d 15, 1989 WL 36132 (Ala. 1989).

Opinion

We granted our writ of certiorari in this case to determine whether Subel's rights *Page 16 were violated when he was denied his "good time" status for violation of rules regulating the Supervised Intensive Restitution ("SIR") program.

However, while this case was pending here, Subel escaped. He thereby abandoned his appeal and his petition for certiorari.Jett v. State, 46 Ala. App. 290, 241 So.2d 131 (1970), and Hallv. Alabama, 700 F.2d 1333 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied,464 U.S. 859, 104 S.Ct. 183, 78 L.Ed.2d 163 (1983).

The fact that Subel was subsequently recaptured does not alter the fact that his appeal was due to be dismissed in accordance with the above authorities. Had Subelvoluntarily returned to custody prior to the dismissal of his case, then Jett and Hall, supra, may have provided for a different result.

The writ is due to be quashed.

WRIT QUASHED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bargo v. State
217 S.W.3d 825 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)
State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. v. Billman
580 A.2d 1044 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1990)
Subel v. State
567 So. 2d 404 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 So. 2d 15, 1989 WL 36132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-subel-ala-1989.