Ex parte Stutzman

Supreme Court

Ex parte Stutzman

275 U.S. 496, 48 S. Ct. 113

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 21, 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 275 U.S. 496 (Ex parte Stutzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Stutzman, 275 U.S. 496, 48 S. Ct. 113 (1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions of Mr. Charles A. Stutzman for leave to file a petition for habeas corpus in this case and to proceed in forma pauperis therein áre'both denied for the reason, that the. Court, upon examination of the unprinted petition, and papers accompanying it, finds that there are no grounds'upon which the writ of habeas corpus can be issued. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody, as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motions of Mr. Charles A. Stutzman for leave to file a petition for habeas corpus in this case and to proceed in forma pauperis therein áre'both denied for the reason, that the. Court, upon examination of the unprinted petition, and papers accompanying it, finds that there are no grounds'upon which the writ of habeas corpus can be issued. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody, as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Eldon T. Cordoza, Bruce Train Hans Lemcke Theodore Sorensen Passco Administrative Services, Inc. Passco Development, LLC v. Pacific States Steel Corporation, and Rust Remedial Services Holding Company, Inc. Community Redevelopment Agency for the City of Union City, Real Parties in Interest-Appellees. Eldon T. Cordoza John Franco Theodore Kutsuki Santos Mora Eugene Luna Ray Seccombe, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Bruce Train, Rust Remedial Services Holding Company, Inc. Community Redevelopment Agency for the City of Union City, Real Parties in Interest-Appellees

320 F.3d 989 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cordoza v. Pacific States Steel Corp.

320 F.3d 989 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 U.S. 496, 48 S. Ct. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-stutzman-scotus-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack