Ex parte Stringer

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 400
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 28, 1960
DocketNo. 36519
StatusPublished

This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 400 (Ex parte Stringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Stringer, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 400 (Ohio 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question which the petitioner raises here is the same one raised by him in the trial court by objecting to evidence offered to show a prior conviction of “armed robbery” and is the same one raised in his appeal to the Court of Appeals.

That court held that the word, “robbery,” was used in the habitual criminal statute in its generic sense and included [401]*401“armed robbery.” The issue was properly raised ou appeal and was determined by the Court of Appeals. Petitioner cannot now have another review of the same issue by this proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-stringer-ohio-1960.