Ex Parte Stephen Kyle Helmcamp
This text of Ex Parte Stephen Kyle Helmcamp (Ex Parte Stephen Kyle Helmcamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed January 7, 2014.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-13-00773-CR ____________
EX PARTE STEPHEN KYLE HELMCAMP, Appellant
On Appeal from the County Court Colorado County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 21,179-A
ORDER
Appellant is not represented by counsel. The trial court has previously determined that appellant is not indigent for purposes of appointment of counsel on appeal. No brief has been filed. It is a well established principle of federal and state law that no constitutional right to counsel exists on a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Graves, 70 S.W.3d 103, 110 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 31.1, ORDER appellant to file a brief in this appeal on or before January 28, 2014. If appellant fails to file his brief as ordered, we will decide this appeal upon the record before the Court. See Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (affirming conviction on record alone where appellant failed to file a pro se brief after being properly admonished); Coleman v. State, 774 S.W.2d 736, 738–39 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, no pet.) (holding that former rule 74(l)(2) (now Rule 38.8(b)) permitted an appeal to be considered without briefs “as justice may require” when a pro se appellant has not complied with the rules of appellate procedure).
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ex Parte Stephen Kyle Helmcamp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-stephen-kyle-helmcamp-texapp-2014.