Ex Parte Steele

121 S.W.2d 605, 135 Tex. Crim. 539, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 808
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 23, 1938·No. No. 20234.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Morrow, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of the district court of Wichita County denying the relator’s application for a writ of habeas corpus.

*540 It is made to appear from the application that the relator is illegally restrained of her liberty by the order of the county court of Wichita County remanding her to the custody of the sheriff of said county until she had made a peace bond in the amount of $750.00.

It is the relator’s contention that the bond is excessive; also that under the facts the county court was without authority to require bond in any sum. However, the facts upon which reliance is had are not brought forward for review.

The district judge having refused to issue the writ and no evidence having been heard on the application, no appeal would lie to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Such is the effect of established precedents. See Ex parte Hughes, 20 S. W. (2d) 1070; Ex parte Shelton, 20 S. W. (2d) 1058; Ex parte Wood, 18 S. W. (2d) 1080. See also Branch’s Ann. Texas P. C., Section 243; 4 Tex. Jur., p. 483, Section 57.

Since this Court' is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, it is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Steele, 121 S.W.2d 605, 135 Tex. Crim. 539, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 808 (Tex. 1938).

121 S.W.2d 605 (Ex Parte Steele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Noble
176 S.W.2d 951 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)