Ex parte Steel

230 S.W.2d 821, 155 Tex. Crim. 93

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ex parte Steel. Read the opinion of the Court — 155 Tex. Crim. 93 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 21, 1950·No. No. 24892·Published

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.,

We remain convinced that Relator was entitled to be discharged upon the expiration of ninety' days after his commitment by the magistrate.'

Under, the provisions of Art. 1004, C.C.P., Relator may not again be arrested upon a charge of the- same offense, except- by a warrant from the Governor of this State.

The State’s motion for rehearing is overruled. •..-.■ • ■ , ■

Opinion approved by the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODLEY, Judge.,

We remain convinced that Relator was entitled to be discharged upon the expiration of ninety' days after his commitment by the magistrate.'

Under, the provisions of Art. 1004, C.C.P., Relator may not again be arrested upon a charge of the- same offense, except- by a warrant from the Governor of this State.

The State’s motion for rehearing is overruled. •..-.■ • ■ , ■

Opinion approved by the Court

Ex parte Steel, 230 S.W.2d 821, 155 Tex. Crim. 93 (Tex. 1950).

Pincite

230 S.W.2d 821 (Ex parte Steel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.