Ex Parte State Vaughn v. Vaughn
This text of 607 So. 2d 246 (Ex Parte State Vaughn v. Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By denying the writ we do not approve the Court of Civil Appeals’ construction and application of URESA. Neither the Act itself, nor the cases construing it, permit the narrow interpretation that the Court of Civil Appeals, 607 So.2d 244, has reached. We deny the writ because of the statement by the Court of Civil Appeals that pending the appeal the circuit court entered an order modifying the divorce judgment by increasing the child support and making the mother the payee; that fact makes the issue in this case moot.
WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
607 So. 2d 246, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 1199, 1992 WL 298092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-state-vaughn-v-vaughn-ala-1992.