Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. State

Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. State

73 So. 35, 197 Ala. 419, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 109
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 19, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 73 So. 35 (Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. State, 73 So. 35, 197 Ala. 419, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 109 (Ala. 1916).

Opinions

ANDEBSON, C. J.

I think that the holding of the Court of Appeals is correct, and the writ should be denied. I think that, when an indictment contains several counts, there would be no election and proof, and a conviction can be had under each count. When, however, an indictment contains a single count and a single charge, there cannot be proof of but one offense, but if in a single count several offenses are charged in the alternative, or the same offense is alternatively charged as having been committed in different ways, there may be proof of each alternative, but after the state closes its evidence the defendant can require an election as to the alternative upon which it will seek a conviction. — Scruggs v. State, 111 Ala. 60, 20 South. 642.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. State
65 So. 3d 971 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
Calhoun v. State
623 So. 2d 448 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Reed v. State
512 So. 2d 804 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Mathis v. State
501 So. 2d 509 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Crittenden v. State
476 So. 2d 626 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Dietz v. State
474 So. 2d 120 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Robinson v. State
428 So. 2d 167 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Wilcox v. State
401 So. 2d 789 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
Williams v. State
383 So. 2d 547 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1979)
Deason v. State
363 So. 2d 1001 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1978)
Pratt v. State
278 So. 2d 724 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Wilkerson v. State
130 So. 2d 348 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1961)
Harris v. State
189 So. 787 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1939)
Harrison v. State
178 So. 458 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
Preston v. State
164 So. 571 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)
Holland v. State
109 So. 885 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Herbert v. State
104 So. 681 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Thomas v. State
101 So. 93 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Scott v. State
100 So. 211 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Connor v. State
98 So. 482 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 So. 35, 197 Ala. 419, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-state-in-re-brooms-v-state-ala-1916.