Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen.

92 So. 606, 207 Ala. 349, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 89
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 20, 1922·No. 5 Div. 826.·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

Petition for review of the decision of the Court of Appeals in Robert *350 Teel v. State, 92 South. 518, 1 reversing the judgment of conviction for refusal by the trial court of the charge therein designated “A.” To the authorities cited by the Court of Appeals in support of said charge may be added the following more recent decisions of this court: Richardson v. State, 191 Ala. 21, 68 South. 57; Glass v. State, 201 Ala. 441, 78 South. 819; O’Rear v. State, 188 Ala. 71, 66 South. 81.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J„ and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.
1

18 Ala. App. 405.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen., 92 So. 606, 207 Ala. 349, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 89 (Ala. 1922).

92 So. 606 (Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hudson v. State
116 So. 800 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Ex Parte Morgan
102 So. 238 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Ashworth v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.
99 So. 191 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Kirkley v. State
99 So. 56 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Thomas v. State
93 So. 287 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Williams v. State
93 So. 57 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)