Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen.

92 So. 606, 207 Ala. 349, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 89
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 20, 1922
Docket5 Div. 826.
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 92 So. 606 (Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen., 92 So. 606, 207 Ala. 349, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 89 (Ala. 1922).

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

Petition for review of the decision of the Court of Appeals in Robert *350 Teel v. State, 92 South. 518, 1 reversing the judgment of conviction for refusal by the trial court of the charge therein designated “A.” To the authorities cited by the Court of Appeals in support of said charge may be added the following more recent decisions of this court: Richardson v. State, 191 Ala. 21, 68 South. 57; Glass v. State, 201 Ala. 441, 78 South. 819; O’Rear v. State, 188 Ala. 71, 66 South. 81.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J„ and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.
1

18 Ala. App. 405.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson v. State
116 So. 800 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Ex Parte Morgan
102 So. 238 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Ashworth v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.
99 So. 191 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Kirkley v. State
99 So. 56 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Thomas v. State
93 So. 287 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Williams v. State
93 So. 57 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 606, 207 Ala. 349, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-state-ex-rel-atty-gen-ala-1922.