Ex Parte State
461 So. 2d 1343
Opinion
Ex parte: State of Alabama
(Re: Roland MARTIN v. STATE).
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Jane LeCroy Brannan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
C. Harry Green, Hamilton, for respondent.
SHORES, Justice.
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, EMBRY, BEATTY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
MADDOX, J., concurs specially.
MADDOX, Justice (concurring specially).
I agree that the writ should be denied, because the Court of Criminal Appeals made the following finding:
"The State failed to present sufficient evidence to sustain the defendant's conviction, and the judgment of the trial court is due to be reversed."
There being nothing presented to us pursuant to Rule 39(k), Ala.R.App.P., to show this finding is incorrect, I agree that the writ should be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte State, 461 So. 2d 1343 (Ala. 1984).
461 So. 2d 1343 (Ex Parte State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JCC v. State
4 So. 3d 1192 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2008)
BB v. State
778 So. 2d 258 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2000)
Bass v. State
701 So. 2d 44 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
J.W.B. v. State
651 So. 2d 73 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
Knight v. State
623 So. 2d 376 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Berry v. State
597 So. 2d 730 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Thompson v. State
494 So. 2d 925 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Williams v. State
468 So. 2d 102 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)