Ex Parte State
This text of 100 So. 466 (Ex Parte State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for cer-tiorari by the state to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in the case of Rollie Cobb v. State, 100 South. 463, wherein a judgment of conviction of appellant was reversed. The only question here sought to be reviewed by the state relates to the ruling of the Court of Appeals as to the exception to a portion of the oral charge of the court. The Court of Appeals construed that portion of the oral charge as contravening the rule of law that the jury must be convinced b,e-yond a reasonable doubt of the córroborating evidence in cases of this character before its further consideration in connection with the evidence of the accomplice. The holding of the Court of Appeals as to this rule of law is correct, and in addition to the authorities therein cited by that court, we may add Malachi v. State, 89 Ala. 134, 8 South. 104; McDaniels v. State, 162 Ala. 25, 50 South. 324.
The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 So. 466, 211 Ala. 320, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-state-ala-1924.