Ex Parte Stanley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Stanley

88 So. 449, 205 Ala. 431, 1921 Ala. LEXIS 478

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 7, 1921

Docket6 Div. 301.

StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 449 (Ex Parte Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Stanley, 88 So. 449, 205 Ala. 431, 1921 Ala. LEXIS 478 (Ala. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

[1] Those assignments of error most seriously insisted up on by petitioner-involve an inquiry as to what evidence was before the trial court and its effect. This court has frequently held that it would not make such inquiry on a petition to review the Court of Appeals. Postal Tel. & Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 South. 91.

[2] This court is of opinion that there was" no reversible error in the other rulings presented- for review. Our judgment is that the trial court properly admitted the testimony of the witness Milliner as .to the physical effect upon himself of the assault committed upon him by defendant at the time of, *432 and in the prosecution of, the robbery charged in the indictment.

Application for certiorari denied.

ANDERSON,. O. J., and GARDNER and MIDLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI