Ex Parte Stancampiano

161 F. 164, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi
DecidedApril 24, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 161 F. 164 (Ex Parte Stancampiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Stancampiano, 161 F. 164, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328 (S.D. Miss. 1908).

Opinion

WARD, Circuit Judge.

This is an application for the discharge under a writ of habeas corpus of Giuseppe Stancampiano, an alien who entered this country March 22, 1906, and is now detained under a warrant of the Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Labor, dated March 16, 1908, pursuant to Act Feb. 20, 1907, c. 1134, § 21, 34 Stat. 905 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1901, p. 402), upon a charge of having been convicted of a felony or other crime or misdemeanor involving-moral turpitude prior to entry. The objection is that the alien was arrested under a similar warrant in December, 1907, upon the same charge, and after a hearing before the board of special inquiry was discharged from custody by the Secretary of Commerce and Labor on the, ground that he was not the person described in the Italian certificate of conviction.

[165]*165The immigration authorities are clothed with executive, and not with judicial, duties. The finding of the Secretary of Commerce and Labor is not a technical res adjudicata, and there is nothing in section 21 to prevent him from arresting an alien a second time to try the same question again, if he is satisfied that the alien has entered the United States in violation of the act. This is no violation of the alien’s rights, because he was admitted into the United States subject to the condition that he might be deported within three years thereafter, if he entered in violation of the act. The questions involved are questions of fact, upon which the determination of the executive officers of the United States is final. Pearson v. Williams, 202 U. S. 281, 26 Sup. Ct 608, 50 L. Ed. 1029.

The writ is discharged, and the alien remanded to the custody of the Commissioner of Immigration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hee Fuk Yuen v. White
273 F. 10 (Ninth Circuit, 1921)
Ex parte Chin Own
239 F. 391 (W.D. Washington, 1917)
Ex parte Wong Yee Toon
227 F. 247 (D. Maryland, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 F. 164, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-stancampiano-mssd-1908.