Ex parte Sprout

22 F. Cas. 1010, 1 Cranch 424
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedJuly 15, 1807
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 F. Cas. 1010 (Ex parte Sprout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Sprout, 22 F. Cas. 1010, 1 Cranch 424 (circtddc 1807).

Opinion

THE COURT

discharged the prisoners on the ground of the defects in the warrant of commitment. It not being on oath, no time of imprisonment limited, and not UDder seal.

THE COURT refused to commit them again on the affidavit of the master, because they doubted whether the authority was not limited to a justice of the peace.

But THE COURT was clear that the voyage contracted for was not ended until the discharge of the cargo and ballast, if required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miles v. Gussin (In re Miles)
104 B.R. 553 (District of Columbia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. Cas. 1010, 1 Cranch 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-sprout-circtddc-1807.