Ex parte Springer

1 Utah 214
Utah Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1875·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Boreman, J.,

delived the Opinion of the Court.

This case is submitted to us upon the question of the power of the Court to admit the petitioner to bail.

The statute says that the Court is authorized to admit to bail except in “ capital cases.” The party stands indicted for a capital offense, and it is .not admitted by the prosecution that this is less than a capital case, and there are no facte to warrant any other conclusion, or that this would be an exception. The fact that the Grand Jury which found the indictment was illegal will not be considered, as we conceive that wé should stand upon the indictment. The petitioner will not be admitted to bail, and his petition is denied.

The other judges concurred:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Springer, 1 Utah 214 (Utah 1875).

1 Utah 214 (Ex parte Springer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Barnett
2023 UT 20 (Utah Supreme Court, 2023)
Winward v. State
2012 UT 85 (Utah Supreme Court, 2012)
Smith v. Milton
98 S.E. 607 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
In re Haigler
137 P. 423 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1913)
Ex Parte Firmin
131 S.W. 1113 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
In re McElroy
58 P. 677 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1899)
People v. Reigel
78 N.W. 1017 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
State ex rel. Dunn v. Noyes
27 L.R.A. 776 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1894)
In re Betts
54 N.W. 524 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1893)
Ex parte Smith
5 S.W. 99 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1887)