Ex parte Spafford

74 So. 358, 199 Ala. 309
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 16, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 74 So. 358 (Ex parte Spafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Spafford, 74 So. 358, 199 Ala. 309 (Ala. 1917).

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

— Petition for writ of mandamus, to be directed to the chancellor of the Southwestern chancery division, to have set aside an order of reference entered in the cause of Bernadine Spafford v. Ralph B. Spafford, infra, 74 South. 354, pending in said court, which order of reference is for the purpose of ascertaining reasonable alimony pendente lite for com[310]*310plainant in said cause. Prior to the decree of reference a decree had been entered overruling demurrers to the original bill, and from such decree an appeal has been prosecuted to this court.

It is conceded by counsel for appellant, or at least it was not disputed in the argument of the cause, that the pendency of the appeal from the decree on demurrer would have no effect upon the right of the chancellor, in the exercise of his discretion, to enter an order for the payment of alimony pendente lite to complainant. — Ex parte King, 27 Ala. 387; Lawrence v. Lawrence, 141 Ala. 356, 37 South. 379.

The petition in this case rested upon the contention on the part of petitioner that the original bill in this case is without equity. The equity of the bill has been determined by this court on the appeal from the decree overruling the demurrer. We held that the bill contained equity. See Spafford v. Spafford, infra, 74 South. 354, this day decided. It results that the writ will be denied.

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Thompson
196 So. 2d 412 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1967)
Owens v. Williams
165 So. 2d 709 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)
Barran v. Roden
82 So. 2d 398 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Taylor v. Bailes
37 So. 2d 656 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Gee v. Gee
32 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Higgins v. Higgins
130 So. 677 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Hillhouse v. Hillhouse
130 So. 206 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Ex Parte Apperson
115 So. 226 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Anonymous
89 So. 462 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 So. 358, 199 Ala. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-spafford-ala-1917.