Ex Parte Smith

891 So. 2d 286, 2004 WL 406765
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 5, 2004·No. 1030608·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

We hereby suspend the provisions of Rule 39(g) and (h), Ala. R.App. P., allowing the respondent to file a brief, and we summarily grant the writ. See Ex parte Gardner, [Ms. 1030309, January 27, 2004] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala. 2004), and Court Comment of January 27, 2004, to Amendment to Rule 32.2, attached as an appendix to the opinion in Ex parte Gardner (a defendant whose triggering date for filing a Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition occurs on or before July 31, 2001, has two years from the triggering date in which to file his or her petition).

Because the triggering date in Joseph Clifton Smith's case was March 16, 2001, his postconviction petition filed on September 27, 2002, was timely. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and Ex parte Gardner.

WRIT GRANTED; REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HOUSTON, SEE, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur. *Page 287

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Smith, 891 So. 2d 286, 2004 WL 406765 (Ala. 2004).

891 So. 2d 286 (Ex Parte Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joseph Clifton Smith v. Donal Campbell
620 F. App'x 734 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)
Smith v. State
71 So. 3d 12 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2011)