Ex parte Smith

63 So. 70, 183 Ala. 116, 1913 Ala. LEXIS 555
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 30, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 So. 70 (Ex parte Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex parte Smith, 63 So. 70, 183 Ala. 116, 1913 Ala. LEXIS 555 (Ala. 1913).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— We are of the opinion that the agreed statement of facts brought the appellant within the influence of sections 1627 and 7564 of the Code of 1907, and the certiorari to review the action of the Court of Appeals is denied.

The defendant also seeks a writ of error, as provided by the act of 1911, authorizing a review by this court of the action of the Court of Appeals in upholding the constitutionality of the foregoing statutes. We are of the opinion that the Court of Appeals correctly held that the statute was not violative of the federal or state Constitutions, in so far as it was applicable to this defendant, who practiced his system of healing for a valuable reward.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLosky v. State
98 So. 706 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Williamson v. State
78 So. 308 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)
Whitehead v. Coker
76 So. 484 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 So. 70, 183 Ala. 116, 1913 Ala. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-smith-ala-1913.