Ex Parte Slaughter

116 So. 684, 217 Ala. 515, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 12
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 29, 1928
Docket6 Div. 984.
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 116 So. 684 (Ex Parte Slaughter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Slaughter, 116 So. 684, 217 Ala. 515, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 12 (Ala. 1928).

Opinion

*516 BROWN, J.

Common-law certiorari to review an order of the Honorable John Den-son, one of the judges of the circuit 'court of Jefferson county, discharging a rule to show cause, issued under section 4052 of the Code, on the complaint of the state fire marshal, against Ernest Henderson.

The function of the writ of certiorari at common law extends to the question of jurisdiction of the inferior tribunal and the external validity and regularity of the proceedings, but not to its intrinsic correctness. Where the forms of law have been followed and jurisdiction appears, here the inquiry ends. Independent Pub. Co. v. Amer. Press Ass’n, 102 Ala. 475, 15 So. 947; Phillips et al. v. Holmes, 165 Ala. 250, 51 So. 625; Adams v. City of Troy, 1 Ala. App. 544, 56 So. 82; Dean v. State, 63 Ala. 153 ; Miller v. Jones, 80 Ala. 93 ; McCulley v. Cunningham, 96 Ala. 585, 11 So. 694 ; 5 R. C. L. 250, § 3. Ex parte Dickens, 162 Ala. 272, 50 So. 218.

The complaint seems to have been made in conformity to the statute which- confers jurisdiction, and the matter was disposed of on the merits, and the proceedings appear in all things regular, with the result that the order discharging the rule must be affirmed. Phillips et al. v. Holmes, supra. Ex parte Dickens, supra.

Writ denied; affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. ' J„ and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watkins v. City of Dothan
109 So. 2d 671 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Ex Parte Watkins
109 So. 2d 671 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Ex Parte Biddle
61 So. 2d 803 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
City of Birmingham v. Reed
44 So. 2d 614 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1949)
Sims v. Sims
35 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Ex Parte Hacker
33 So. 2d 324 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Broadway v. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co.
20 So. 2d 41 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)
Worthington v. City Board of Education
154 So. 796 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
Ex Parte Tulley
149 So. 700 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Fulton v. McQuirter
149 So. 700 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Town of Boaz
147 So. 195 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Fowler v. Fowler
122 So. 444 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 684, 217 Ala. 515, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-slaughter-ala-1928.