Ex Parte Simmons

1910 OK CR 258, 112 P. 41, 35 Okla. Crim. 381, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 257
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided December 3, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Simmons, the petitioner, being imprisoned under a judgment of the county court of Ok-fuskee county for a violation of the prohibition law, has applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus to the end that he be discharged.

His contention is that the county court was without jurisdiction to try him, and that the judgment of convic *382 tion rendered against him is void, for the reason that the information upon which the prosecution was based was not verified. This presents the same question just determined by this court in case No. A-817, Ex parte Tom Talley, 4 Okla. Cr. 398, 112 Pac. 36, and decision in that case is controlling here. The petitioner’s imprisonment, therefore, is not illegal.

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued will be discharged, and the petitioner will be remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Okfuskee county, that he may execute the judgment of the county court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex Parte Simmons, 1910 OK CR 258, 112 P. 41, 35 Okla. Crim. 381, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 257 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

1910 OK CR 258 (Ex Parte Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ivy v. State
1966 OK CR 48 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1966)