Ex parte Shoemaker
644 So. 2d 966, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 367, 1994 WL 407184
Opinion
On Remand from the Supreme Court
The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of May 13, 1994, 644 So.2d 961 (Ala.1994), the petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.
WRIT DENIED ON REMAND.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Shoemaker, 644 So. 2d 966, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 367, 1994 WL 407184 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).
644 So. 2d 966 (Ex parte Shoemaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Howard
939 So. 2d 68 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2006)
State v. Crossman
687 So. 2d 817 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
State v. Henley
675 So. 2d 557 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)