Ex parte Shoemaker
644 So. 2d 966, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 367, 1994 WL 407184
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedAugust 5, 1994
DocketAV92000788
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 644 So. 2d 966 (Ex parte Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ex parte Shoemaker, 644 So. 2d 966, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 367, 1994 WL 407184 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).
Opinion
On Remand from the Supreme Court
The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of May 13, 1994, 644 So.2d 961 (Ala.1994), the petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.
WRIT DENIED ON REMAND.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Howard
939 So. 2d 68 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2006)
State v. Crossman
687 So. 2d 817 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
State v. Henley
675 So. 2d 557 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
644 So. 2d 966, 1994 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 367, 1994 WL 407184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-shoemaker-alacivapp-1994.