Ex Parte Shirack

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Shirack

1946 OK CR 60, 169 P.2d 1022, 82 Okla. Crim. 334, 1946 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 215

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 5, 1946

DocketNo. A-10755.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1946 OK CR 60 (Ex Parte Shirack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Shirack, 1946 OK CR 60, 169 P.2d 1022, 82 Okla. Crim. 334, 1946 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 215 (Okla. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

This is an original action instituted by the petitioner, Alvin J. Shirack, for the purpose of being admitted to bail upon a charge of murder now-pending against him in the district court of Tulsa county.

The petition alleges that the said Alvin J. Shirack is restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Tulsa county, Okla., by reason of a commitment issued by an examining magistrate, committing him to the county jail after preliminary examination had upon a complaint wherein the petitioner Alvin J. Shirack was charged with the crime of murder alleged to have been committed by killing one Doris Alvey on April 9, 1946; that by information filed in the district court of Tulsa county he is charged with the murder of said Doris Alvey; that under the evidence produced on his preliminary examination, the proof of his guilt is not evident nor the presumption thereof great that petitioner is guilty of murder; that petitioner has made application to be admitted to bail to the district court of Tulsa county, which application was by said court denied.

At the time of said hearing, the petitioner introduced a transcript of the testimony taken before the committing magistrate at the preliminary examination and the assistant county attorney of Tulsa county ap *336 pearing on behalf of the respondent, sheriff of Tnlsa county, stated that he thought the petitioner was entitled to some reasonable bail.

Without expressing any opinion upon the weight of the evidence, we are of the opinion that the evidence produced upon the preliminary examination was sufficient to warrant committing petitioner for trial upon the crime of murder. We are also of the opinion that under the testimony submitted, when considered together with the statement of the county attorney, that petitioner should be allowed bail.

It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be admitted to bail in the sum of $20,000, said bond to be conditioned as provided by law, to be approved by the court clerk of Tulsa county; that when said bond is given and approved by the court clerk of said county that petitioner be discharged from custody.

BAREFOOT, J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JONES, P. J.

This is an original action instituted by the petitioner, Alvin J. Shirack, for the purpose of being admitted to bail upon a charge of murder now-pending against him in the district court of Tulsa county.

The petition alleges that the said Alvin J. Shirack is restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Tulsa county, Okla., by reason of a commitment issued by an examining magistrate, committing him to the county jail after preliminary examination had upon a complaint wherein the petitioner Alvin J. Shirack was charged with the crime of murder alleged to have been committed by killing one Doris Alvey on April 9, 1946; that by information filed in the district court of Tulsa county he is charged with the murder of said Doris Alvey; that under the evidence produced on his preliminary examination, the proof of his guilt is not evident nor the presumption thereof great that petitioner is guilty of murder; that petitioner has made application to be admitted to bail to the district court of Tulsa county, which application was by said court denied.

At the time of said hearing, the petitioner introduced a transcript of the testimony taken before the committing magistrate at the preliminary examination and the assistant county attorney of Tulsa county ap *336 pearing on behalf of the respondent, sheriff of Tnlsa county, stated that he thought the petitioner was entitled to some reasonable bail.

Without expressing any opinion upon the weight of the evidence, we are of the opinion that the evidence produced upon the preliminary examination was sufficient to warrant committing petitioner for trial upon the crime of murder. We are also of the opinion that under the testimony submitted, when considered together with the statement of the county attorney, that petitioner should be allowed bail.

It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be admitted to bail in the sum of $20,000, said bond to be conditioned as provided by law, to be approved by the court clerk of Tulsa county; that when said bond is given and approved by the court clerk of said county that petitioner be discharged from custody.

BAREFOOT, J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1946 OK CR 60, 169 P.2d 1022, 82 Okla. Crim. 334, 1946 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-shirack-oklacrimapp-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack