Ex Parte Sherman

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Sherman

1945 OK CR 62, 159 P.2d 755, 81 Okla. Crim. 41, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 193

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 13, 1945

DocketNo. A-10591.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1945 OK CR 62 (Ex Parte Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Sherman, 1945 OK CR 62, 159 P.2d 755, 81 Okla. Crim. 41, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 193 (Okla. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

JONES, J.

This proceeding in habeas corpus raises the same issues of law reviewed and discussed in the case of Ex parte Snyder, 81 Okla. Cr. 34, 159 P. 2d 752, this day decided.

The petitioner, Jake Sherman, was given a parole in November, 1934, wherein it was provided, among other conditions, that the prisoner should immediately upon his release leave the State of Oklahoma and remain out of the state forever.

The petition further alleged that the prisoner, in accordance with the terms of the parole, went to the State of Indiana, where he committed a crime, was convicted, and served his sentence. That while there, his parole was revoked by Governor E. W. Marland, and, at the expiration of his sentence, he fought extradition, but was returned to the State of Oklahoma where he has since been confined in the State Penitentiary.

While the facts are not identical with Ex parte Snyder, supra, the questions presented involve a discussion of the same principles discussed in the Snyder case. The conclusion therein reached disposed of the contentions of the petitioner, Jake Sherman.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is accordingly denied.

BAREFOOT, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI