Ex parte Saunderson
21 F. Cas. 540, 1 Cranch 219
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1804·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
refused to admit him, because he had not continued to reside, according to the act of 1804 (2 Stat. 192), and had not made a previous declaration of his intent according to the act of 1802 (2 Stat. 153).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex parte Saunderson, 21 F. Cas. 540, 1 Cranch 219 (circtddc 1804).
21 F. Cas. 540 (Ex parte Saunderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Vasicek
271 F. 326 (E.D. Missouri, 1921)