Ex Parte Sansom

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ex Parte Sansom

87 So. 408, 205 Ala. 54, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 352

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 25, 1920

Docket4 Div. 895.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 So. 408 (Ex Parte Sansom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Sansom, 87 So. 408, 205 Ala. 54, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 352 (Ala. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

The decision of the Court of Appeals which petitioner seeks to bring into review, i. e., the ruling on the inquiry as to the value of the hogs, involved a finding of fact, and therefore will not be reviewed. This court, without committing itself to the third of the propositions of law on which the Court of Appeals has justified the ruling of the trial court on this point, holds that no error has been made to appear.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The decision of the Court of Appeals which petitioner seeks to bring into review, i. e., the ruling on the inquiry as to the value of the hogs, involved a finding of fact, and therefore will not be reviewed. This court, without committing itself to the third of the propositions of law on which the Court of Appeals has justified the ruling of the trial court on this point, holds that no error has been made to appear.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 So. 408, 205 Ala. 54, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-sansom-ala-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack