Ex Parte Sansom
87 So. 408, 205 Ala. 54, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 352
Opinion
The decision of the Court of Appeals which petitioner seeks to bring into review, i. e., the ruling on the inquiry as to the value of the hogs, involved a finding of fact, and therefore will not be reviewed. This court, without committing itself to the third of the propositions of law on which the Court of Appeals has justified the ruling of the trial court on this point, holds that no error has been made to appear.
Writ denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and BROWN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte Sansom, 87 So. 408, 205 Ala. 54, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 352 (Ala. 1920).
87 So. 408 (Ex Parte Sansom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte C. M. McMahen & Sons
106 So. 57 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)