Ex Parte Salvador Zavala

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 29, 2011
Docket10-11-00198-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Salvador Zavala (Ex Parte Salvador Zavala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Salvador Zavala, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11-00198-CR

EX PARTE SALVADOR ZAVALA

From the County Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. 52,611

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Salvador Zavala pled no contest in 2004 to the offense of unlawfully carrying a

weapon. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 46.02 (West 2011). This is a misdemeanor offense. Id.

(b). Zavala also had a capital murder charge pending in Houston. Zavala has been

attempting to file various applications for a writ of habeas corpus regarding the

misdemeanor offense. We have dismissed Zavala’s appeals twice. See Ex parte Zavala,

No. 10-10-00323-CR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 8806 (Tex. App.—Waco Nov. 3, 2010, no pet.

h.); Ex parte Zavala, No. 10-10-00238-CR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 6262 (Tex. App.—Waco

Aug. 4, 2010, no pet. h.).

Zavala filed another application for a writ of habeas corpus with the trial court

which the trial court denied. He has now attempted to appeal that order. In a letter dated June 8, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Zavala that his appeal was subject to

dismissal because it appeared the trial court did not rule on the merits of his application

for writ of habeas corpus and there is no right of appeal from a refusal to issue a writ of

habeas corpus when the trial court does not consider and resolve the merits of the

application. See Ex Parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866, 869 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); Ex Parte

Okere, 56 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). The Clerk also

warned Zavala that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless, within 21 days of the

date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal.

Zavala filed a response; however, it does not convince us that the trial court ruled on

the merits of his application for writ of habeas corpus.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 29, 2011 Do not publish [OT06]

Ex parte Zavala Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Okere
56 S.W.3d 846 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Ex Parte Hargett
819 S.W.2d 866 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Salvador Zavala, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-salvador-zavala-texapp-2011.