Ex Parte Salvador a Ramos

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 25, 2012
Docket14-12-00739-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Salvador a Ramos (Ex Parte Salvador a Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Salvador a Ramos, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed October 25, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-12-00739-CR ____________

EX PARTE SALVADOR A. RAMOS

On Appeal from the 179th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1265117-A

ABATEMENT ORDER

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus seeking to set aside appellant’s guilty plea pursuant to article 11.072 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The trial court is required to “enter a written order including findings of fact and conclusions of law.” Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.072 § 7(a). The record filed with this court does not include any written findings of fact and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant’s application. The proper procedure to correct the error is to abate the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4.

The State filed a motion for extension of time to file its brief and obtain the findings and conclusions. We grant the request and issue the following order: We ORDER the appeal ABATED and remand the case to the trial court. The trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings and conclusions filed with the clerk of this court on or before November 26, 2012.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and conclusions is filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. The State’s brief shall be due thirty days after the appeal has been reinstated.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Salvador a Ramos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-salvador-a-ramos-texapp-2012.