Ex parte Ryan
This text of 154 F. 217 (Ex parte Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Beavers v. Henkel, 194 U. S. 73, 24 Sup. Ct. 605, 48 R. Ed. 882, it was held that the filing of properly certified copy of the indictment made out a prima facie case for the government. I do not understand that Tinsley v. Treat (U. S. S. C. March 4, 1907), 27 Sup. Ct. 430, 51 R. Ed.-, has in any way modified that ruling. It holds simply that defendants should be allowed if they so desire to put in evidence to overcome the prima facie case. The only evidence which has been put in here is that of the accused persons who in response to leading questions have stated under oath that they did not commit the offenses charged.
The writs are dismissed. Prisoners may be presented on Monday at 1 p. m. for entry of order and further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 F. 217, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-ryan-circtsdny-1907.