Ex Parte Russell Dale Mortland

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 11, 2011
Docket03-11-00106-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ex Parte Russell Dale Mortland (Ex Parte Russell Dale Mortland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Russell Dale Mortland, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN



NO. 03-11-00106-CR

NO. 03-11-00107-CR

Ex parte Russell Dale Mortland


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. CR-05-0582-C & CR-05-0583-C, HONORABLE WILLIAM HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N


Appellant Russell Dale Mortland appeals orders denying relief in these article 11.072 post-conviction habeas corpus proceedings. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072 (West 2005). We affirm.

On November 29, 2007, Mortland was convicted for retaliation (cause number CR-05-0583) and three counts of fraudulently filing a financing statement (cause number CR-05-0582). He was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment for the retaliation and twenty-four months in state jail for each of the fraud counts. Imposition of sentence was suspended in both causes, and Mortland was placed on community supervision. On appeal, this Court reversed the conviction on the third fraud count and ordered that count dismissed; the other convictions were affirmed. Mortland v. State, Nos. 03-08-00029-CR & 03-08-00030-CR (Tex. App.--Austin Dec. 30, 2008, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

In his writ applications, Mortland contends that the evidence does not support the district court's order that he pay $450 in each cause to reimburse the attorney appointed as standby counsel at Mortland's trial, where he chose to represent himself. See Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Setting aside whether this is a proper ground for post-conviction habeas corpus relief, the district court judgments do not order the payment of attorney's fees, and there is no other evidence in the record that such payment was ordered.

The orders denying relief are affirmed.



__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Affirmed

Filed: August 11, 2011

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayer v. State
309 S.W.3d 552 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ex Parte Russell Dale Mortland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-russell-dale-mortland-texapp-2011.