Ex parte Rone

Ohio Supreme Court

Ex parte Rone

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 28, 1960

DocketNo. 36531

StatusPublished

This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402 (Ex parte Rone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Rone, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402 (Ohio 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offense with which he was charged and of which he was found guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offense with which he was charged and of which he was found guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-rone-ohio-1960.