Ex parte Rohe

5 Ark. 104
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 15, 1843·Published

Opinion

By the Court,

Paschal, J.

The mittimus returned by the sheriff sets forth no offence with which the prisoner is charged, or of which he,stands convicted; nor does the said precept run in the name of the State. When a man is imprisoned, the cause of his caption and detention should be sent along with him. The writ is wanting in a constitutional provision necessary to all writs; and it is equally insufficient in not setting forth the cause of the restraint of liberty.

The prisoner must, therefore, be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ex parte Rohe, 5 Ark. 104 (Ark. 1843).

5 Ark. 104 (Ex parte Rohe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.