Ex Parte: Rodney Collins Smith
Opinion
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed February 5, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00066-CR
EX PARTE RODNEY COLLINS SMITH
On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W18-00143-V(A)
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Nowell Rodney Collins Smith has filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal an adverse
decision by the court of criminal appeals on his application for writ of habeas corpus.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Our records show appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in
prison. On direct appeal, the Court modified and affirmed the trial court’s judgment.
See Smith v. State, No. 05-18-00491-CR, 2019 WL 1615353, at *1 (Tex. App.—
Dallas Apr. 15, 2019, pet. ref’d). In his notice of appeal, appellant states he is
appealing a November 4, 2020 decision denying relief on his writ application
docketed as cause number W18-00143-V(A) and WR-91,767-01. Enclosed with the
notice of appeal is a postcard from the court of criminal appeals indicating it had, on November 4, 2020, denied without written order appellant’s writ application
docketed as trial court no. W18-00143-V(A) and as writ no. WR-91,767-01. The
clerk’s record has been filed and it confirms appellant is attempting to appeal an
adverse decision of the court of criminal appeals.
After a final felony conviction, the court of criminal appeals has exclusive
authority to grant post-conviction habeas relief. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art.
11.07, § 5; Bd. of Pardons and Paroles ex rel. Keene v. The Eighth Court of Appeals,
910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam).
A court of appeals may only review appeals when authorized by law. See
Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696–97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Article 11.07 does
not authorize this Court to review the court of criminal appeals’ determinations on
an article 11.07 writ application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §§ 3, 5;
Keene, 910 S.W.2d at 483; In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (per curiam).
Because we have no jurisdiction to review the denial of appellant’s writ
application, we dismiss the appeal.
/Erin A. Nowell/ Do Not Publish ERIN A. NOWELL TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) JUSTICE 210066F.U05
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
EX PARTE RODNEY COLLINS On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial SMITH District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. W18-00143- No. 05-21-00066-CR V(A). Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. Justices Molberg and Reichek participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Judgment entered this 5th day of February, 2021.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ex Parte: Rodney Collins Smith (Ex Parte: Rodney Collins Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.