Ex Parte Roberts

31 U.S. 216, 8 L. Ed. 375, 6 Pet. 216, 1832 U.S. LEXIS 468
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 28, 1832
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 31 U.S. 216 (Ex Parte Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Roberts, 31 U.S. 216, 8 L. Ed. 375, 6 Pet. 216, 1832 U.S. LEXIS 468 (1832).

Opinion

Mr Chief Justice Marshall

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The court is of opinión that the present is not a proper case for the interposition of this court, by way of mandamus. The application to set aside the default and inquest, was an.application to the discretion of the district court; and is not distinguishable in principle from- applications to grant new trials. This court has always considered such applications as r'ésting In the sound discretion of the court where the cause is depending, and not a matter for a mandamus or writ of err'or.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application of William O. Wesseler
367 F.2d 838 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1966)
Application of Max O. Robeson
331 F.2d 610 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1964)
Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.
217 F.2d 39 (Ninth Circuit, 1955)
Otis Elevator Co. v. Pacific Finance Corporation
68 F.2d 664 (Ninth Circuit, 1934)
Holmes v. Jennison
39 U.S. 614 (Supreme Court, 1840)
People ex rel. Bristol v. Pearson
3 Ill. 189 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1839)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 U.S. 216, 8 L. Ed. 375, 6 Pet. 216, 1832 U.S. LEXIS 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-roberts-scotus-1832.