Ex Parte Roberts

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ex Parte Roberts

1922 OK CR 46, 204 P. 653, 21 Okla. Crim. 55, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 207

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 3, 1922

DocketNo. A-4216.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 46 (Ex Parte Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex Parte Roberts, 1922 OK CR 46, 204 P. 653, 21 Okla. Crim. 55, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 207 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

*56 PER CURIAM.

This is an application for a writ of ha-beas corpus by petitioner, W. E. Roberts, in which he represents that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty and imprisoned by George Frampton, sheriff of Comanche county, Okla.; that the cause of said restraint is that petitioner was arrested on the 20th day of February on a warrant issued on a complaint by M. T. Perkins, justice of the peace, charging the defendant with feloniously deserting a minor child. The petition then sets up alleged facts attempting to show that there is no legal obligation on the petitioner to support the said child. No copy of any commitment is attached to the petition.

The Attorney General demurred to the petition on the ground that same did not contain facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to the relief prayed for, and on a hearing of the same it was ordered by the court that the demurrer be sustained and the petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*56 PER CURIAM.

This is an application for a writ of ha-beas corpus by petitioner, W. E. Roberts, in which he represents that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty and imprisoned by George Frampton, sheriff of Comanche county, Okla.; that the cause of said restraint is that petitioner was arrested on the 20th day of February on a warrant issued on a complaint by M. T. Perkins, justice of the peace, charging the defendant with feloniously deserting a minor child. The petition then sets up alleged facts attempting to show that there is no legal obligation on the petitioner to support the said child. No copy of any commitment is attached to the petition.

The Attorney General demurred to the petition on the ground that same did not contain facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to the relief prayed for, and on a hearing of the same it was ordered by the court that the demurrer be sustained and the petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 46, 204 P. 653, 21 Okla. Crim. 55, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-roberts-oklacrimapp-1922.