Ex Parte Robert Joseph Yezak v. the State of Texas

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 6, 2025

NO. 03-25-00540-CR

Ex parte Robert Joseph Yezak

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES CRUMP AND ELLIS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ELLIS

This is an attempted appeal from a purported order denying the pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 6, 2025

NO. 03-25-00541-CR

Ex parte Robert Joseph Yezak

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES CRUMP AND ELLIS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ELLIS

This is an appeal from the order denying the motion to recuse or disqualify the trial court judge entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 6, 2025

NO. 03-25-00551-CR

Ex parte Robert Joseph Yezak

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES CRUMP AND ELLIS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ELLIS

This is an attempted appeal from a purported order denying the pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.